The upcoming election for the Board of Estimate and Taxation (BET) in Greenwich has created a power struggle between Democrats and Republicans. The BET, which consists of 12 members, sets the town’s budget, determines the tax rate, and decides how much money the town government borrows. While all candidates running for the board are likely to secure a seat due to the equal representation of both parties, the winning party will appoint the chair of the board, who has the power to break ties in a deadlock. The Republicans have maintained control of the BET for majority of the past century.
Elliot Alcheck, one of the six Democrats running for the BET, aims to change the town’s financial management and address what he sees as wasted spending on infrastructure improvements. He believes that Democrats support funding important projects such as schools, while their opponents continually deny funding. Addressing the issue of keeping the mill rate low and limiting borrowing, Alcheck says, “proper prioritization and capital planning will prevent further increases to our backlog of capital projects.”
Matt DesChamps, another Democrat running for the BET, emphasizes the need for competence and transparency in financial decision-making. He highlights the unnecessary delays in major school projects, which have not only cost taxpayers money but also deprived residents of safe and modern schools. DesChamps, who previously identified as Republican, believes in making data-driven decisions to reduce tax liabilities and maintain sound financial practices. He stresses the importance of funding approved school projects and safety needs, while also ensuring adequate funding for first responders.
In conclusion, the upcoming BET election in Greenwich is crucial as it will determine the party that controls the board. Both Democrats and Republicans have put forward candidates who want to bring about change in the town’s financial management. While Democrats advocate for funding important projects and prioritizing capital planning, Republicans have historically focused on keeping the mill rate low. Ultimately, voters will have to decide which approach will lead to the best outcomes for their community.